@WiktorWolf-xr9wx
To zależy, zadne rozwiązanie nie jest idealne ale jest tez trzecie krore laczy cechy obu.
@catalintgjiu
Fire tube is more efficient, water tube starts more quickly
@larryhankison2436
Steam Engineer here 👍
@phillpauley6672
Why not combine both?
@3jasom
one for water heaters another one for stream
@bimmerworld94
What if the furnace was made of tubes carrying water. You could get that really hot 😈
@lawrencedouglas624
Cleaver brooks 4 pass steam boiler
@americanadventureoutdoors4213
Definitely the water tube boiler . They will get up to working pressure a lot faster than a fire tube boiler and that’s where they become more efficient.
@Muammar_al-Gaddafi
Not the right way the fire must go up an the whater can take more heat with a long boiler
@michaelbayer5887
... Exotherm - Endotherm. Input Output. Entrance of Exit.😮
@Whyistruth