@jimmyjoe1488

Love how you articulate things so intuitively, so that someone can understand the framework of quantum mechanics, rather than depending on confusing terms to build their internal model.

@oldschoolman1444

The more we learn the more questions we have. ๐Ÿ˜Š

@pepsitwsit

I like the confusion regarding gravity " it's not a force , it's the effect of energy on space-time" and then, for the rest of the documentary refer to it as a force .

@semorgh2854

The first 30 minutes was very educational. Thanks to Narrator.
You explained SPIN so ingeniously, a thousand thanks to you.

@Sebastianmaz615

WHAT!!  Holy ----!  10:45  (concerning graviton detectors)  ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

@paalmuru9598

๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰ wow super nice

@Tairngire-rb7te

Ah, a marvelous spectrum of infinitum and yet more to learn despite our lifetime. 
An adept observation to share here. Extraordinary content for a view alongside this quarter of an evening. Delightful nonetheless."
:TBa

@PioLisieux

Surely there's deeper more pround 'levels' of reality that we are not privy too.

@thetobi583

There's still something i don't understand... If we are supposed to be using simulations to explain the universe, why is it we only use gravity? Why don't we put electromagnetism in the supercomputers as well?

@Birkelandaurora

Electromagnetic universe

@4kevbot3

This is one of the best channels on space science on YouTube. Many thanks for all the great work.

@rayraycthree5784

Magnets and electrostaticly charged objects exert contiuous, measurable, attractive or repulisive forces on certain, relatively close  materials but electromagnetic implies an energy that oscillates between a potential voltage field and a magnetic field while radiating from its source at the SOL through the medium of space time.

@rebokfleetfoot

it's not that hard to comprehend, we simply can not interact with a fractional waveform, it doesn't mean they don't exist :)

@gregoryallen0001

1:02:19 super nice graphic

@charlesemond7916

Mass under compression is the development of gravitational pull. The greater the collective mass the greater the gravitational force.

@el_pescadore

So simple yet complicated.    Iโ€™ve held this cave man understanding of Gravity as a preteen, before Physics class! 

Mass (e.g.  a planet, moon) called a โ€œcurvature of Space-Timeโ€ in the video, itโ€™s more like a void where the planet is tearing a hole in the โ€œfabric of Space-Timeโ€ 

As the universe continuously expands as time marches on, so expands the field of Space-Time of which our universe is made.

@ShopperPlug

10:55 - So what does LIGO detectors are finding about gravitational waves, they've said they detect many gravitational waves all the time, so what is the difference between a "graviton" and gravitational waves? Is gravitational waves a group or a large sum bundle of gravitons? If so, it shouldn't be that complicated to figure out a thought experiment which can be applied in a lab to measure a single garviton.

@DerekBarton-gl8kf

Absolutely eye opening my friend 
Thank you so much for your help and hard work โค

@AWKuhns

The simple answer is gravity is related to mass. It is a byproduct of the positive force that holds atoms together. The question should be what holds atoms together?

@paradigm-gauge

I have heard gravity explained by the difference between time dilation on the near side of an object vs the rear side of an object, creating a drag that brings an object of smaller mass quicker toward an object of bigger mass.