@Raffaello44
The point is that, in this scenario, we are not the people: we are the CANDLE
@hancigul5533
Rich people dont have to be worry about anything. Thats the point.
@GiGi-g1b
Next 20-30 years. Is exactly the time i will be working.... great...
@rebeccacasas6152
Make people rich first so that they can join you in AI without having a job... ☺️..God Bless Mr. Mah. Thank you for sharing.
@kalpanathakali8598
Very inspiring 👏 🙌 🙏
@McCarthy1776
Theres very few jobs that AI cant take and the new jobs created will only be for really high IQ, highly educated people and even a lot of those will eventually be replaced by AI. Average IQ people wont be able to do hardly anything AI cant do and the few thinfs they can will be extremely competitive and still taken by the high IQ, top of the line people. The people who are cashiers, truck drivers, janitors etc. Will not have any jobs they can get. Only jobs involving complex creativity and deep human connection will be safe and there wont be enough for everyone
@davecros4887
AI is replacing human intelligence. Electricity supplemented human labor.
@ASTAATEEN
Electricity cant think.
@amitasaxena5684
This is the difference between vesion of people's 👏👏👏
@Neurobytzzz
Thanks for that wonderful tip
@BehruzGanijonov-cc3hc
very inspiring
@auliashandy4949
Absolutely great advice never worry about the future🤩am copy mr jack ma said
@Cherryberry_c8o
You are right 👍
@ByeByeCali
Not saying ai is bad, but the problem is electricity is an energy that doesn’t have any processing capability and ai is a very intelligent tools that got all the knowledge far beyond human. I think he should talk about will ai out smart human one day
@NishantKumar-dm9tb
In interview once time Elon musk said that AI is very dangerous for men 😮😮😮
@furqantarique3484
I don't want to be jobless due to AI
@terrycaldwell7700
This guy is a very smart man might be the smartest man I have ever seen
@VinhNguyen-cr6pt
Technology facilitates work and production. Money facilitates living. At certain level of wealth, an additional unit of money, the marginal increase in happiness diminished. So, the amount of marginal increase in happiness contributed by an additional unit of money depends on the level of wealth one already has. We can see the analogy between increasing income vs happiness and advancing in technology vs. number of jobs will be created. In addition, we need to re-examine our human activities, wants, and needs and the impacts of technology. So, making the assumption that new technology will have the similar effects like those happened in the past will lead to failed planning and failed adaptation of economy and society.
@SabavathSavaisingh
Please give some information about AI
@WealthGrit