@TruthisFacts90

There was no direct engagement with recent government failings, including controversies around ministerial salaries, alleged conflicts of interest, or lack of transparency in procurement and appointments.

@MartinWPThng

A hallmark of Singapore’s electoral system, gerrymandering once again played a central role in GE2025.

@diypromax

Also majority people said there are no more food safety and other safety, the next meal the people eat are the last meal of their lives of course.

@TruthisFacts90

While the PAP may claim a “renewed mandate,” GE2025’s outcome must be understood in light of the structural advantages that shaped it.

@diypromax

As people still gathering and traveling, don't forget it's always a matter of time before the next biggest spike in cases, and it's those people last travel of their lives of course.

@benjaminwee9815

I believe most Singaporeans voted for the PAP not out of fear of change due to external global factors, but because they were concerned about a freak election result where the WP and SDP could win. 
Many Singaporeans still want the PAP to remain in power long-term, as they are the foundation of how the world perceives us, and to be fair, they’ve done well. 
People may have just wanted to send a message, without intending to push for change.

However, after seeing the large crowds at WP rallies, the silent majority became anxious and ultimately voted for the PAP.

@jijingshizi

The brilliance of WP's contests in East Coast, Punggol and Tampines GRCs in GE2025 will, hopefully, be appreciated in the next GE.

These 3 GRCs will allow WP to mount a three-pronged encirclement of Pasir Ris-Changi GRC, which will be ripe for the picking in the next GE. It will be the EBRC that will be 'boxed in' then because no matter how it will attempt to slice and dice these GRCs, it will be in vain for Tampines and Pasir Ris-Changi GRCs as all polling districts in these 2 GRCs will fall into areas the WP currently holds, just contested or can contest.

The EBRC can still attempt to work on Punggol and East Coast GRCs or even cease their existence altogether but it will be 'boxed in' albeit to a lesser extent, especially if it decides to subsume Jalan Kaya SMC into the neighbouring Nee Soon or Ang Mo Kio GRCs. It may have more room to manoeuvre for East Coast GRC which WP have contested since GE2006 but do note that the neighbouring Marine Parade GRC was contested by the WP in GE2015 and GE2020.

In any case, it will then be the WP that holds the initiative to decide whether they want to contest all or which of these 4 GRCs (or whatever new forms or names they take then).

@IGNlTlON

GE results has been positive for the country, the sub-par opposition parties were soundly rejected by the voters and when the opposition threw up a competitive slate of candidates, the voters ultimately decided who they think will best represent their interests. 

As with the past 2-3 GEs since social media has been widely adopted, we see how the opposition supporters are very much more vocal on the online space as compared to the silent majority. I hope that going forward, the SUPPORTERS OF THE RULING PARTY & GOVT will also SPEAK UP so that the opposition supporters don't drown out everything and have a monopoly of the online discourse. We have to do so if we truly believe that the PAP's position are for the greater and longer term good of our country, so that opinions are not influenced in only one direction. We need to provide a rational perspective and reasoned counterpoint to the senseless whining.

@diypromax

SURPRISINGLY majority people said ALL  people are the REAL every day opposition people themselves, each have their own ways of course.

@htahtoo8851

The percentage can be misleading. Look at the numbers.
2025 vote share compared with 2020 vote share -
PAP's 2025 vote share is 65.57%, an increase of 37,279 votes compared with 2020. 
Similarly, WP's vote share is 14.99%,  an increase of  77,841 votes.

@bobafett5757

It is not a landslide win for PAP when it scored only 65% overall votes cos landslide winning means need to score at least 80% overall votes and the fact is WP is seen as a winner on this GE for retaining its  seat when up against the incumbent giants and heavyweights

@bobafett5757

WP is gaining momentum and strong ground in the Eastern area and likely it can occupy Punggol Tampines and even Marine Parade and East Coast area in the next GE cos the younger voters are growing and they lean towards WP policies and transparency and dont be surprised by 2050 possibly WP will become the incumbent once the older folks are gone

@MartinWPThng

This dependency isn’t new, but its packaging in GE2025 was particularly refined. The PAP avoided aggressive rhetoric and instead presented itself as the only credible custodian of stability—reinforcing the psychology of risk aversion.

@Liverpool4life5

It’s not a mandate when wp defended all its grounds and made in roads

@diypromax

The pap party still dare to allow non singaporeans to buy hdb flats, even knowing sg run out of land to build hdb flats and run out of road for cars, pap party not ashame and still can face the people?

@diypromax

Since sg tops world first in scams nation, majority people said it's a matter of time before the remaining singapore reserves $$ and gold bars be scammed away, or by the pap party of course.

@TruthisFacts90

In contrast, the attacks against opposition candidates were largely based on fabricated or misleading claims, often lacking attribution or factual grounding.

@bobafett5757

PAP needs to focus more on geopolitical and tariff economy issues and stop being too socio demographic centric cos its not benefiting to the middle and lower income household earners here and also it doesnt serve a nice tone for unison goals

@TruthisFacts90

Voters may have chosen continuity, but that does not equate to unconditional approval—nor does it offer a blank cheque for unchecked governance.

@MartinWPThng

Paul Tambyah, who again lost in Bukit Panjang SMC to PAP’s Liang Eng Hwa by a wider margin than in 2020, attributed the party’s reduced vote share in part to the timing and appeal of the S$1 relief schemes.