@aristotlekaporis7337

Have you considered if they just believed in themselves hard enough

@tm-qi9cr

They will never form a square of any size except for the original one, as they clearly can’t form a smaller square and if they could form a bigger one then they would also be able to form a smaller one

@nightcaller92

I did come to the conclusion that they couldn't form the larger square, although I didn't understand that diagonal jumps would be allowed, not that it seems to have made a difference

@hps362

This was such a satisfying one to solve.

@paxaq683

A different explanation: the parity of each coordinate of each spider is invariant. But it is different for the smaller and the larger squares.

@SleepyHarryZzz

If you allow simultaneous jumps (where they jump of where the other spider is at the instant they begin the jump, then that can make a larger square (albeit rotated relative to the original, and some factor larger that I cba to calculate).

This looser version works because it breaks the reversibility of each move, which is a necessary feature for the version presented

@ErsagunKuruca

Lovely proof, great visuals

@rodrigoappendino

You should have told they can move diagonally

@Anti_During

Вопрос можно иначе поставить: можно ли получить квадрат со стороной в два раза меньше ?

@jervinsevilla6677

I figured this out using a chessboard

@dekucake

You never said they could jump diagonally, or over multiple spiders.

@silascosta4750

my answer was right!! should have spent this shot in a casino :,)

@kanishksingh5146

The logic that they couldn’t have gotten from smaller square to the bigger square because they can’t go from bigger to smaller is not a good argument imo. How would you disprove the hypothesis that they can go from smaller to bigger but not from bigger to smaller.

@LitoHomol

Kinda reminds me of my math teacher

@FurryNonsense

This is wrong
"They always jump the same distance and only over each other once"

*Proceeds to jump across the entire map, and over two spiders*

@Arid-xp7hl

I didn't understand this video. am I stupid?

@LocalBosnian-99

Im so intelligent 🤓

@69420lover

AHHHHHHHHHHH

@4SAKEN_XX

Am I early?