@MrMadhavbroco7220
Sir, the way you explain is very fascinating. But when solving mathematical operations we should write2+2=4 or not?
@alexstanley3378
Pretty sure this is covered pretty extensively in philosophy too- Hegelian re-conceiving of matter as a reintrepretation of Aristotlean ontological categories recognises this constant process of flux the world is in and moves away from a statis-based view of the world, a later 20th century philosopher/physicist saw this as some weird precursor to how quantum physics encouraged us to view the world in this more effervescent ever-flowing manner. I don't know how well you're versed in philosophy, and I know it can face a lot of neglect in the scientific community, but I thoroughly recommend reading more philosophy- it would compliment and critique your takes well I think
@myjamstation7784
Dude you’re awesome 😀 thank you for your content.
@Wagnerbaum
This should have more views xD I'm having a blast watching this
@stevenbliss989
Deep! Thing we assume so often disguises what the truth actually is, but for practicality we must.
@Michael-Celeste
If a language specifies subjective perspective of personification, then by default everyone is an expert. Therefore communication is a mutual responsibility of call and response.
@samurai3164
at 11:45 when you said Reactants NOT EQUAL to Products, its actually referred to as REACTANTS = Products + Byproducts ?
@dominiquefortin5345
This breaches a fundamental tenet of pedagogical teaching which is abstraction. You should teach one concept at a time. You can hint at other context but force feeding information to make the philosophical point that nothing stays the same and therefore we should rethink the concept of identity serves no one.
@noonewn
you said, "Almost all truth is bounded truth." --- What might be an exception?
@allen_tor
So for the first, have you considered nuclear fission. For the second, good luck with that. For the third, you're a bond villain aren't you.
@noonewn
"Very interesting!" May this comment provide input for the YouTube algorithyms
@dominiquefortin5345
This beginning of this video is only to say that the contexte matters. I find this pedagogical method unnecessarily convoluted to explain how a computer don't counts. And the video is full of unnecessary information. Is this a philosophic argument or a video about a physical computing machines. Is Global Science Network a cult ??
@jason.arthur.taylor
Good intro on creativity.
@allen_tor
Okay smart guy, answer me this, "Is an abstraction real?"
@parmenides2576
This seems to be a form of anti- platonism. You are claiming the real world has “noise” so to speak but Platonists would state that while that is true, real math exists in the abstract realm of the forms. So you are both saying the same thing but differing on which is more meaningful: the material world or the abstract
@abrahamgvm1620
Cosmic radiation will change the position of some of the electrons of the Orange.
@farhan-momin
great video
@richardprice9730
Yes this great thought is at the very heart of dependent arising , that is there is no such thing as matter as such it IS all appearing in consciousness I hypothesize at the deepest level of mind movement is the intrinsic factor in the information , it is precise but unfathomable , it is ineffable or spiritual ie with infinite potential but then appears or the wave form contracts or condenses as the appearing energy or matter , organic life is based on analogues .
@deepstories32
my brain is lagging 😅
@Enigma758