@the-smartteacher

Before anyone says I’m just using AI, let me make it clear: the AI-generated voiceover is only 2-5% of the total work in my video. For every video on this channel, I mostly follow these steps to create my content:

1. Topic Research: I research and select a mechanical engineering topic, then create a detailed storyboard.

2. Script: I write a clear and informative script (tailored to the video’s duration), focusing on technical details and keeping the message precise.

3. Data Analysis/Simulations: If complex diagrams, simulations, or visualizations are required, I use tools like Python, Excel VBA, or JavaScript to generate the necessary data for the animations.

4. Exporting Data/Simulations in the Right Formats: I export the data (like CSV files, charts, and XLS) for integration into my 3D software.

5. 3D Modeling: I model the components and assemblies in my 3D software.

6. 2D and 3D Animation: I create movement sequences and camera animations, using my 3D software and the Python/VBA scripts I generated for automation when applicable.

7. Texturing, colors and Lighting: I apply materials, shadows and colors to the 3D models and optimize lighting to ensure clear, high-quality visuals.

8. Data Visualization: I add technical overlays, such as charts and graphs, to make complex concepts easier to understand.

9. Rendering and Post-Production: I render the video in high resolution, then handle post-production tasks like editing, adding sound, and captions.

10. Publishing: Finally, I find the right description, hashtags, and title, and upload the video to YouTube.

People often underestimate how much effort goes into making these videos and jump to conclusions about ‘AI scripts’ and ‘AI tools.’ But here’s the reality: AI alone can’t create high-quality content. It can save time and make some tasks easier, but the real work is still in your hands.

@florenciomorales9919

I appreciate the dedication, it would be awesome if we saw how this is used in real life if it isnt too complicated

@blugamers8891

I'm glad I found someone who will actually teach me something, I don't mind the AI voice over at all because the information is all valid and useful.

@rubberduck0315

The double cardan has to be offset by 90° for the output velocity's range to half.

The result is that the fluctuations in speed occur double as often and half as much yet by the 90° offset they occur one fluctuation at a time cancelling themselves out.

The animation is wrong

@the-smartteacher

Team Double Cardan, and you ? 😊

@LB-ri8ho

It's crazy to me how someone thought of a design like that 😮

@alfa_kenny_body

Endlich wieder gute shorts! 
Ich lasse ein Abo da und danke dir von Herzen mein Bruder. Weiter so!

@Literally_hatsune_miku_39

Metal drummers will know this from the double pedal linkage

@100beamm

double cardan joint is good but in car driveshaft, its size will make it a little bit hard

@TheActualSnowball

I still watch your videos!

@Foostini

the difference is there's two of them, hope this helps

@tspcrowther

I was thinking about this on the way to work this morning. Is a double universal joint the same as a constant velocity joint, as you'd find in a vehicle's drive shaft? Or are they a totally different beast?

@felix8781

Here's what I understood so cardan joint = simple but vibrates abit when moving on the output part while double cardan joint runs smoothly with no vibration? 

Btw thanks for creating these types of video I'm very interested in engineering but I never was  able to find any content online till I found your channel thank you !

@joshyoung1440

So for the single cardan joint, it seems like the sine wave should be moved up to cycle around the input line, no? I mean it's not like the output velocity goes negative, it just gets smaller 😅

@SumwhatRedneck

I just realized that this dude was german or speaks german Danke für deine tollen Videos, ich habe dafür Google Translate benutzt

@vincentrobinette1507

double Cardan joint good, IF the input and output shafts are PARALLEL! The changes in angular velocity cancels, giving a perfectly smooth output, without "cogging".

@Mustang_G

I broke my elbow last week, which joint should i use? Please help.

@Ragdad.Falderbalgen

Can you make one about continuous velocity joints?

@DaveFromVh1

I love this channel!! Could you possibly change the thumbnail image? It makes me extremely uncomfortable, thank you!!

@Tjita1

Or use a Rzeppa, i.e. CV joint.