@stricknine6130
Great interview!!!! Thank you for covering this topic. I hope we find something soon.
@Christopher-r2e
This was a really awesome interview. Wish the other guest had more chances to chime in.
@Kasamira
So happy to see a new video! I’m taking obsessive notes as you guys speak
@ParameterGrenze
I loved how detailed it got on the science and terminology! Wasn’t expecting that, but I loved it.
@MasterRulesTheWorld
Ignore the haters saying this is a bad topic. It's a great topic and interesting to listen to, whether it's a real thing or not. Just simply discussing the science and sharing insights.
@MCsCreations
Fantastic interview, John! Thanks a lot!!! 😃 I really hope we discover something soon! Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@RonMar
While it's disappointing that the result looks less and less positive, I'm glad there is so much rigorous validation being done.
@hhjk377
Yep those were definitely some words and terms that I understood.
@flowerpt
Perhaps the greatest discovery out of all of this will be Science learning that you can't prove a negative. Even if these guys don't succeed in replicating the result they are doing an admirable job showing both variable isolation and the hypothesis feedback loop. They may write the most complete 'failure to replicate' paper in the end. And it was cool to hear Jeremy for eighteen seconds. :D
@Jackson09
Great topic, not one way too speculative with so little real science behind it, that it's hard to take seriously. This topic is cutting edge, and in the future will prove to be one of the most important fields of science. Great interview, great show.
@txrwauy
Another great episode. As always the stress on scientific method and evidence is welcome.
@BRUXXUS
Always baffles me how these papers can come out with some claims of new materials, but are either poorly written, leaves out critical information, or are generally ambiguous. If they want to keep things a secret so they can sell it, then don't freakin' publish a scientific paper. If no one can replicate the results, that's not science, it's just advertising for funding. It's something that keeps coming up with Ben at Applied Science when attempting to replicate a paper. Edit: aside from that tangent, this was a fun episode! I'd love to hear more from them on all the cool stuff they're working on.
@vermasean
Early Event Horizon Team checking in 🙋♀️🙋♂️
@thesoundengine
Ha, I started listening and thought “oh shit, is that Jeremy?” and had to check the title. Love that lad.
@chromabotia
No matter where it seems to be coming from, material science is damned interesting.
@xtraa
Very informative and interesting to listening to, I enjoyed it very much, thank you!
@carmattvids2899
Bedtime and it great to see a new video to let me drift off too.
@scottre3220
EDS = Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy. You can also use WDS=Wavelength Dispersive Spectroscopy with an incident SEM electron beam. These will yield elemental composition (although AES will also for a smaller interaction volume). XPS will also yield some chemical bonding information.
@TheUltimatePositionOfPower
Wow, lots of people who read the title and commented without watching the video 😂 "SMART"
@adambrain8365