How to Call a Generic Function with typename and Non-typename Template Arguments in C+ +

A guide on effectively calling a generic C+ + function that accepts both `typename` and non-`typename` template arguments. Learn how to handle template parameters without modifying the function prototype.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/67044915/ asked by the user 'xxxQWERTZxxx' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15604220/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67044998/ provided by the user 'cigien' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8372853/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to call a generic function with typename and non-typename template arguments?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Template Arguments in C+ + : Calling a Generic Function

When working with templates in C+ + , developers often face challenges with function prototypes that require more than one type of template argument. One such common scenario occurs when you need to call a generic function that takes both typename and a non-type parameter (like an integer). In this guide, we’ll break down the problem and provide a clear solution for calling a function such as radix_sort with a typename and a size parameter.

The Problem

You have a function prototype like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The challenge arises when you want to specify the size (in this case, NBITS) while still allowing the compiler to deduce the type of Iterator automatically. When the function only has type parameters, you could easily call it without specifying these types, but introducing a non-type parameter complicates things.

The Catch

You cannot modify the original function prototype, which means you need to find a way to provide NBITS without having to explicitly declare the Iterator type in the function call. So, how can you achieve this?

The Solution: Explicitly Providing Iterator Type

When working with templates, it's important to understand how to explicitly specify types. Here’s how you can call the radix_sort function while providing the NBITS parameter:

Step 1: Specify the Iterator Type

To call the radix_sort function correctly, you will need to provide the type of the Iterator along with the non-type parameter. For example, if you are working with a std::vector<int>, you could use decltype to help determine the iterator type automatically:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this line of code:

decltype(v.begin()) deduces the exact type of the iterator used in the vector.

42 is the compile-time constant passed for NBITS.

Step 2: Creating an Overload

To avoid specifying the Iterator type explicitly at every call, we can create an overload of the radix_sort function that allows the type to be automatically deduced while still passing the desired NBITS value. Here’s how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this overload:

The template parameters are swapped, allowing Iterator to be deduced from the argument as usual.

It calls the original radix_sort implementation, leveraging the deduced Iterator and the specified NBITS value.

Why Use This Overload?

Simplicity: By providing this overload, you can simplify your function calls and avoid boilerplate code.

Flexibility: Your code remains flexible and clean, making it easier to read and maintain.

Conclusion

Handling typename and non-typename template arguments in C+ + can pose a unique challenge, particularly when you can't alter the original function prototype. By explicitly providing the iterator type when necessary and creating an overload to facilitate type deduction, you can effectively work around these challenges.

With these techniques in mind, you can confidently implement your radix_sort function and provide the necessary parameters without convoluting your codebase. Happy coding!