Understanding static Member Functions with pthread_create() in C+ + Multithreading

Explore the implications of using a `static` member function with `pthread_create()` in C+ + , including potential side effects and best practices for thread creation.
---
This video is based on the question stackoverflow.com/q/67393707/ asked by the user 'pdm' ( stackoverflow.com/u/1464937/ ) and on the answer stackoverflow.com/a/67413308/ provided by the user 'txtechhelp' ( stackoverflow.com/u/1152524/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: What are the implications of using a static member function with pthread_create()?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding static Member Functions with pthread_create() in C+ + Multithreading

C+ + offers powerful features for multithreading, especially with the introduction of C+ + 11. However, when it comes to using POSIX threads (pthread), some of these features may not be applicable, leading to confusion. One common question revolves around the implications of using a static member function as a thread start routine with pthread_create().

In this guide, we will break down the implications of this design choice and clarify whether it comes with any "undesirable side effects."

Problem Statement

When using pthread_create(), a common pattern is to specify a function that serves as the start routine for the thread. A C+ + developer might consider using a static member function of a class for this purpose. The concern arises regarding the functionality of such a function when dealing with class member variables and multi-threading.

Key Questions to Address

Can a static member function be used as a start routine with pthread_create() without causing issues?

Is it better to make the class's internal data structures public or convert the function to a global one?

Exploring the Solution

Can We Use a Static Member Function?

The good news is that utilizing a static member function with pthread_create() is perfectly valid. Here are the main points to consider:

No Direct Risks: Using a static member function does not introduce undefined behaviors (UB) or crashes on its own. The function can access member variables of an object instance passed to it.

Understood Functionality: The static function can perform operations just like any other function. The key distinction is that it doesn’t require an instance of the class to be called.

Example Breakdown

Let’s examine the original class structure provided:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The count_vaccines can be invoked as follows in a thread context:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This allows easy access to the specific class instance's data.

Should We Make Data Members Public?

In some scenarios, developers may consider making internal variables public or converting methods to free functions. Here are some insights:

Data Protection: Keeping data members like vaccine_count private ensures better encapsulation and protection against unintended modifications. It's essential for maintaining the integrity of the data.

Use of Getters and Setters: You could provide public getter and setter functions if needed, but often it complicates the program without significant benefit.

Conversion to Global Function: While it's feasible to convert methods to global functions, the class context is often crucial for maintaining structured code and understanding data relationships.

Understanding Static Context

A common misconception arises from how static applies to member functions. Here’s a critical point to remember:

A static function is simply not tied to a specific instance of the class and can be called without one. However, this does not imply that its execution is bound to a single thread or core. The OS manages thread execution and makes determinations on how functions are executed across multi-core systems.

Execution Across Cores

Just because a function is static does not affect whether it can be executed simultaneously on multiple cores:

Each invocation of a static member function can indeed run on multiple threads without issue as the OS schedules them accordingly.

Whether a function runs on different cores depends on the operating system's management of the threads—not on the static nature of the function.

Conclusion

Using a static m