Understanding Why Your Python Mock Only Works with Specific Import Styles

Discover the reasons behind Python mock behavior in unit tests and learn how import styles can affect your testing strategy.
---
This video is based on the question stackoverflow.com/q/77572663/ asked by the user 'ningelsohn' ( stackoverflow.com/u/19486832/ ) and on the answer stackoverflow.com/a/77606735/ provided by the user 'User051209' ( stackoverflow.com/u/18108367/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why is my phyton mock only working with a specific way of import?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Your Python Mock Only Works with Specific Import Styles

When tackling unit testing in Python, particularly with mocking, it’s common to encounter scenarios that raise questions about the behavior of your code. One such question is: Why is my Python mock only working with a specific way of import? In this guide, we'll break down this issue and help you understand how Python handles imports and mocks.

The Problem

You have a utils class that contains a function designed to return an ID, and another class, Car, that uses this function. Your goal is to test the Car class while providing a specific ID through mocking the get_id() function. However, you found that your mock was not working in one version of your import while it worked in another.

Consider the following code snippets to illustrate the problem:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Test Code

In your test file test_car.py, you attempted to mock the get_id() function. Initially, this is how you set it up:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, this did not provide the expected mocked response when calling get_id().

The Solution

You could modify your imports in car.py and test_car.py to make the mock function correctly respond in your test:

Change the Import Style in car.py:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Modify Your Test Code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of Changes

Moving to utils.get_id:
By accessing get_id() through utils, your mock in test_car.py directly substitutes the original function used by the Car class.

Understanding the Mock Behavior:
The line that previously used get_id directly now explicitly uses utils.get_id, which is correctly mocked before the Car class's setup is called.

Why Your Original Mock Didn't Work

In your original setup where you imported get_id directly into car.py, the function name get_id in Car refers to the original get_id from the utils module, not the mock you set in your test. Hence, when the setup() method called get_id(), it referred to the original function rather than your mocked version.

Conclusion

Understanding how Python resolves imports is crucial for effectively using mocks in unit testing. By adjusting how you import modules and functions, you can control what your classes reference during tests. This illustrates the importance of being mindful about the scope and identity of imported items in Python, especially when implementing mocks for tests.

If you align your imports as shown and accurately point your tests to what you want to mock, you can ensure your test results will match your expectations. Happy coding and testing!